Resonant Charging

Search this site:

This graph gives the results of a PSpice simulation using a 72nF cap with a wide range of different ballast values. The aim being to find the most efficient combination. This result only applies to 200bps Synchronous gaps running on 50Hz.

**Static** gaps with their random firing, are not too fussy about capacitance value, provided firstly, that there is enough charging current available, and secondly, that you are not using a NST, as these are not very tolerant of voltage rise and also use (in effect) an internal ballast. If you are using a NST then best to use a static gap, and make sure the value chosen does not resonant with the supply frequency, otherwise the resulting voltage rise could damage the NST.
However if you are running on a more robust power supply that also uses an external ballast for limiting current, you can use a SRSG (**S**ynchronous **R**otary **S**park **G**ap) to take advantage of resonant rise. These prefer specific combinations of capacitance and ballast, that are designed to complement one another to get the maximum amount of power out.

An explanation of this can also be found on Richie Burnett's site, so his page *Here*, which inspired me to use the system, is well worth a visit.

**200 bps SRSG Capacitor**

**With** my 200bps SRSG the original capacitance value I was using was 72nF, so I carried out some PSpice simulations to find the best ballast value to use with that particular capacitor value, while using a synchronous 200bps rate *SRSG*.

Although using a smaller value ballast will allow more current to flow when used with an SRSG, that *does not necessarily mean* it will result in more useable power. This is because the *Power factor* (Wikipedia), comes into play, and it is this issue which Richie's *Page* on Resonant Charging deals with.

The graph above gives the results of using a 72nF cap with a range of different ballast values, and you can clearly see that with a 200bps SRSG, 60H to 62H of ballast gives the best power throughput **when** used with a 72nF capacitor. The required ballast figure would change if either the bps rate or the capacitance value changed of course.

This is "Resonant Charging", and as my coil's success is down to Richie's work, it's worth explaining in its own section.

**Any** rotary gap which is **synchronous **(**S**RSG) will fire at fixed pre-determined intervals (bps rate) and in fixed positions, relative to the AC mains voltage cycle. This is opposite behaviour to an **Asynchronous** (**A**SRSG) rotary gap where although it too fires at fixed pre-determined intervals, unlike a SRSG these firing points are no longer in fixed positions, relative to the AC cycle.

Because of this regular firing arrangement, the capacitor can charge quicker if the frequency is compatible with the charging ballast. This means differing bps rates will need different charging frequencies, if they are to achieve a decent power factor. A decent power factor will mean we have more power to use!

So Richie Burnett undertook numerous PSpice simulations to find the relevant frequencies for differing bps rates (an enlarged version of his graph is below).

The results found that a 200bps charging circuit achieves its best power factor when the charging components, (the MMC's capacitance & ballast's inductance), resonate at 75Hz.
*(see Richie's original chart Here)*.

A slightly enlarged version is below: (Copyright is **entirely** *Richie Burnetts*)

Based on my own 200bps graph (top of page), my 72nF & 62H ballast's resonating frequency works out to round 76Hz.

So the charging circuit's preferred resonate frequency, with a *synchronous* rotary, is always dependant on the rotary BPS rate that is being used. So for resonant-charging to occur you need to match your charging components (ballast and capacitor) values, so that their resonant frequency is suited to the bps rate that you have chosen to use.

The

In the blue circuit the small inductance value of the primary is insignificant however in comparison to the ballast's large value inductance, but it forms a vital part of the circuit.

In the red circuit however, this small primary inductance value is now very significant, as in conjunction with the main capacitor value, it determines the primary's resonant frequency.

Richie though favours a 0.85 PF for the reasons he states, but on lower bps systems, as in my case at 200bps, this can result in a rather large capacitor value being needed, which may be unreasonable for the charging current available, or for practical reasons.

Richie's webpage is unfortunately unfinished after this stage, but he does give the full procedure needed in an earlier

I have though made a copy of this post that

it